If the Chinese government is so confident in what they're saying—subsidies, economic development and benefits for the Tibetan people—then let's have a referendum. Let Tibetans and Tibet choose a Tibetan leader or a Chinese leader. Let them vote. I'm absolutely certain, hands down, that Tibetans and Tibet would vote for a Tibetan leader.
Now, if you want to go into details, where are the subsidies going? So many Chinese migrants are moving to Tibet: 90% of businesses and enterprises in Lhasa, the capital city of Tibet, are controlled by Chinese people. So, all the hydro power you were mentioning is owned or run by Chinese companies and Chinese officials. How are Tibetans benefiting? All the minerals extracted from Tibet are befitting Chinese officials, not Tibetan people.
We were talking about the Panchen Lama. Even the 10th Panchen Lama, who was the vice-chairman of the National People's Congress, said, a few days before he died, that the Chinese government has benefited more after the occupation of Tibet than the Tibetan people. So, all those promises that the Tibetan people had benefited are proven wrong, as per the statement of Panchen Lama, who was the vice-chairman of the National People's Congress.
Clearly, they talk about those things, subsidies and all, but most of them go to the Chinese migrants who moved to Tibet to own businesses.