Thank you very much.
According to one report, 92% of publications in Lhasa are in the Chinese language; only 8% are in the Tibetan language. Clearly you can see that China's government is investing a lot to promote the Chinese language as the medium of instruction, using China's language as the main one and undermining the Tibetan language, even though, constitutionally, the Tibetan language ought not only to be used, but also to be promoted by the Chinese government.
Yes, Buddhist temples and monasteries are destroyed. You mentioned the cases of Larung Gar and Yarchen Gar. You can google Yarchen Gar. You can see clearly that half of the infrastructure of Yarchen Gar has disappeared. It's flat. It just happened in the last few years that several nuns also committed suicide. Nowadays even a monk or a nun, to leave their monastery to go to another place, needs to seek permission. For district-to-district travel, they need to seek permission. This is the kind of repression and constraints put on the Tibetan people who would like to follow their religion.
Now, Tashi Wangchuk was simply asking for what is already guaranteed in the Chinese constitution and the minority national act, 1984: that the Tibetan language be allowed to be used, bilingually, as a medium of instruction. He was chronicled by none other than The New York Times, saying that he was following the law of the land. However, he was sentenced as a separatist and is in prison.
Even those basic rights are not allowed—