I have no objections. I'm happy to proceed on that basis. In terms of Mr. Oliphant's earlier point, Standing Order 106(4) just says “four members”. It's obviously based on a model, but the way it works at a standing committee is that any four members, including four Liberals or four Conservatives, could summon a meeting on their own.
This is a much more consultative requirement, in terms of engaging all political parties, than exists at other standing committees, but we're comfortable with it. I suspect if you were to change it from four members to five members, it would be a distinction without a difference, because to get four members of the multiple parties, you'd need, for example, three Conservatives and one Bloc. It would be just as easy to get four and one, or something like that.
I don't know if it's a major point either way, but Mr. Bergeron's amendment works and it's something we're willing to accept.