Mr. Chair, I just want to briefly clarify two points that were raised.
In terms of Mr. Bergeron's latest intervention—and I'm sorry if I wasn't clear about this—what I had meant to refer to was having the consul general of Canada to Hong Kong, our representative in Hong Kong. That was a separate discussion from inviting a representative of the PRC in Canada, which I agree is also worthwhile, and I agree that the appropriate person to extend that invitation to would be the ambassador.
Mr. Harris was talking about, essentially, the two different work plans. I definitely think we should be guided by the work plan with respect to the Hong Kong study in particular in the short term as we complete the Hong Kong study. The longer-term work plan will probably be something we want to revisit in the subcommittee and have a wider conversation about, recognizing that a lot has changed, that there's a lot new in the context of the relationship between Canada and China since we previously discussed that work plan: all of the circumstances around COVID-19, around.... I don't need to list them; everybody knows. A lot has changed. I'm not saying that we might not want to be guided to some extent by that as well, but what I was proposing in particular is the Hong Kong work plan and that we use that as a guide for the Hong Kong study, but then maybe have a separate conversation at the subcommittee about the global work plan.