I'd like to add to what was provided by the analyst. I'm looking at something in front of me that proposed nine meetings beyond the date on which the House was closed down because of the COVID situation, with a priority for future meetings listed as well. There are four items. I think there was a fairly robust work schedule that was not completed, and I see that only one or two of the witnesses listed here have actually testified to date. We may have to revisit some of that, but there is quite a hefty schedule here that still applies.
I may be corrected by our analyst, but I'm looking at the February 27 report. The eventual one was adopted on March 9, which I don't have in front of me. Maybe not all of this was adopted. Maybe it was just the first parts of it, but a fairly large document was prepared for what the work of the committee might be. I believe it's in order, given the passage of time, for the subcommittee to look at this and come back with recommendations for the full committee.