Thank you.
I wanted to hear Mr. Bergeron's amendment, because I think it lays down a possible good foundation.
However, I would put the following to him and to my colleagues here. What about staying with the four members view, but one member from each of the recognized four parties, so there would be a Liberal, Conservative, Bloc and NDP? It wouldn't have to be unanimous. The four members would not all have to agree. However, you'd have to have a majority to go ahead with a meeting request.
Is that something colleagues would consider? I think it's a fairer approach, with all due respect. You would have all recognized parties taking part in the discussion and it does not require unanimity.