That's a very obtuse answer, sir. I thought the minister was much more forthcoming the last time to suggest that nothing had been done. We were told it was only done when asked and nobody had asked. I don't know why that can't be repeated here tonight, if it is indeed true.
Let me turn to another question. We're talking about foreign interference. We talk about foreign influence. We talk about espionage. Perhaps you're the best person to answer this question, Mr. Vigneault, because of the nature of your agency's work.
Can you distinguish between foreign influence, foreign interference and espionage? They seem to be talked about in a different way. Is there a hierarchy here of what might be legal, what makes it illegal and what makes it subject to prosecution?
Could you try that one, or is there someone else who is better able to answer that?