Let me ask you another question.
It's interesting that you're here before us advocating a strong approach, a strong response, to the threat posed by the People's Republic of China in a way that protects us and our citizens. There's been a bit of a debate in Canada in response to our own situation of hostage diplomacy, some advocating a sort of concessional approach, to the point that in response to hostage-taking, we would make concessions in the context of Meng Wanzhou, for example, in order to elicit good behaviour.
Meanwhile, you're taking the approach that we need to respond with strength in a way that's going to protect other people. I'm inclined to agree with you that it's the right approach.
Could you speak directly to those people in Canada who maybe are personally affected by the situation of hostage diplomacy, for whom these things are very raw and very close? Could you tell them why you have taken this type of approach rather than recommending the concessional approach?