I'm happy to add a couple of words.
I think there is that risk. I know that many of my Canadian friends of Chinese heritage are very uncomfortable now with the tone of the dialogue. It's reflected in its crudest manner sometimes in street incidents of racism, graffiti and that sort of thing.
I think an element of maturity is needed in Parliament, among academics and in the media to provide an element of leadership such that one can, as suggested, criticize policies of the Government of China without criticizing the 20% of the world that is Chinese. It's too easy to slip into a demonization factor that might be appropriate if we were at war, but we're not at war.
We have immigrants arriving from that country. Almost two million of our fellow citizens have Chinese heritage. A certain delicacy in speech is necessary, and leadership from all—from universities, from the media and from Parliament—is needed in the language used, so as to not feed crude racism.