Those are some of the complaints that I'm seeing and hearing about the Indo-Pacific strategy. It talks a lot about things, but the actual deliverables aren't there when they're specified. However, most things aren't specified.
I was reading an article by Hugh Stephens from the school of public policy in Calgary. He says:
While it is expected that some details will be lacking when a new comprehensive strategy is unveiled, the lack of specificity and details on the paths to implementation of many of the IPS’s elements is concerning.
That's my concern. It seems like it's a lot of talk, but there are no actual mechanisms within the strategy to measure the deliverability of the things they've said. Would you share that concern, or any concerns you have around that as well?