We've had votes on suggested changes to some of the language to perhaps recharacterize the finance minister's reaction to the invitation to appear. We've had language suggested that we voted on and that was rejected.
What we now have is the amendment that Mr. Seeback has proposed that in essence—and the chair believes much the same as Mr. Fragiskatos has indicated—we give it one week, and if there's no date, then the rest of this motion will be acted upon. It's basically that.
What I would suggest we do is vote on Mr. Seeback's amendment, which would put us in the situation of having one week to come up with a date. If there is no date, then the motion with the amendments suggested by Mr. Seeback would basically be acted upon.
Ms. Lalonde, go ahead.