Thank you very much for a very good question.
I was actually in Washington, D.C., in the days when the AIIB was being seriously talked about among the G7 countries.
Yes, we see the various opportunities in Asia. They need infrastructure development, so we know there is a demand. In the case of Japan, we really think the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank are making a big effort. We are also a very important part of it. Therefore, we are not a member of the AIIB.
However, from the outside, I think there are certain important elements. One is the openness of infrastructure development. The second is transparency. What kinds of projects are going on? Third, we have to think of life-cycle costs, not just once but for the long run. They have to be very economical and very efficient. Fourth, we need to see the environmental elements and human rights of the labour force making that infrastructure. The sustainability of those recipient countries is also very important.
All those elements of openness, transparency, life-cycle costs, human rights, environmental issues and sustainability need to meet the international standard. That is our view on the AIIB.