Thank you, Chair.
Given that (a) is still in the motion to make this study a priority over its other business, I don't think we need to have (b) because the motion is already prioritizing these meetings. We don't need to take on extra meetings. I think that having three hours at a time really gives us a chance to delve into a subject in terms of its time frame, with three hours straight of looking into the matter, whereas breaking it up into more meetings may lessen that intensity.
I just feel that (a) does address it. As Mr. Villemure has suggested, there are still other studies. We have to finish the Indo-Pacific strategy, as well as the Taiwan study.
Thank you.