With that, I think we will take the vote on removing item (b).
The amendment proposed is to remove item (b), which essentially, if I try to interpret what's been said, would keep us to our regular schedule of one meeting per week of three hours.
(Amendment negatived: nays 6; yeas 5)
What's next? The amendment goes down to section (d) and would remove the notion of the summons pursuant to Standing Order 108(1), considering that this always remains an option in any event.
Mr. Chong, did you wish to speak to this?