This then raises an issue that wouldn't ordinarily come up at the beginning of any study: Notwithstanding the list that Mr. Chong has included in his motion, should we then entertain submissions from members as to other people they would want to invite?
Again, we have to go back to the point that Mr. Chong made very clearly. Even with two meetings a week, really, in adding an extra hour of witness testimony, we're looking at the prospect of having this particular subject, which is litigating things that have happened in the past, consume a lot of the capacity we would have to look at things like the Indo-Pacific strategy, like Taiwan, like others, which have ramifications going forward, especially in terms of government policy.
As chair I would just issue a caution that we manage our expectations as to what we hope to accomplish here, versus what we've already taken on in terms of the work that the committee has decided it wants to do.
Mr. Villemure.