Absolutely. Again, I will say what I said earlier. This is to provide some definition and scope to this study. The list of witnesses is exhaustive. We're agreeing to that list. We've agreed now to have at least two meetings. We will be meeting twice a week as per what has been adopted in the committee.
I think this list allows us to get to the bottom of the issues that we all want to discuss. There is no need to have this catch-all provision with our witnesses. When the end of the questioning is done, if we feel that more witnesses are needed, then more witnesses can be added at that time, but by Mr. Chong's own admission, it will require about five meetings to go through all these witnesses, which I think is ample time. Then, at that time, we will assess as a committee whether we need more witnesses or not.