Yes, I continue to hold the belief that it was a very expeditious process.
In August 2018, when we first engaged with PHAC to give them an insider threat briefing, they raised a concern with CSIS about the two scientists. That led us to share some information and some advice with PHAC.
They undertook their administrative review, and the results of that review were shared with CSIS. What you see in the chronology and in the documents that have been produced to the committee is that at the time of the first briefing to CSIS, we did not have a lot of information, but at the second briefing, we presented the results of our investigation. At that point, you could see that in this short period of time, we carried out a very extensive investigation that led PHAC to take quick administrative measures to protect the lab and Canadians.