In this case, there was intellectual property at play. This was the patent that was initially identified at the time. As evidenced in the documents, there were different discussions about whether the intellectual property in question was indeed proprietary or would have been more broadly available. The investigation, however, uncovered evidence of other collaborations that were under way that were undeclared.
The protocols and procedures around the requirements for approving international collaboration agreements were subsequently reinforced. The issues relating to the definition of what constitutes intellectual property have also been reinforced through awareness campaigns and underlined by the management of that office, which has been centralized and strengthened.