I agree 100%. I've heard those same things from Germany.
Every country's approach to achieving both its energy goals and emissions targets is going to be different, and every country is starting somewhere different. I think we're very neutral as to how that's done. There are people within our network with a focus on hydrogen. There are people within our network with a focus on various types of energy overall.
I spoke a lot about LNG because I think it is the resource we have that has the capacity to meet the thing that is backstopping renewables now in Canada and internationally. That's something Robert Johnston from Columbia University has highlighted. It supports the transition.
LNG is something that people are signing contracts for into that time frame of 2050. Is it for our LNG or someone else's? Are they going to be looking for a baseload from other jurisdictions that are not us? Are they going to use more coal, which is what a lot of these countries have done, including Germany?