With respect to your second question, it would be grossly unfair, I think, to say that the problems we have in terms of bringing in new talent and new programming people are due to the union structure and the union contract. The problems we have are due to a company that has been shrinking for the last twenty years in terms of number of employees, amount of money it has, and it's only right and fair that union contracts be written to protect existing employees. Sure, it's frustrating because of bumping rules and all that--and that's one of the reasons we are quite satisfied--but I must say that the current contract we have with the CMG allows for more contract employees, more temporary employees, and in that way at least young people can come in to help ventilate the place, help develop new programs and with time actually become permanent employees.
I think we have gained a significant amount of flexibility, but let's bear in mind that we're talking about an organization that is essentially shrinking. In that situation it's only right to protect those who are already employed.