Yes.
My colleague from the governing party has invited input on a new museums policy. Your budget is being cut now, but there's a promise that somewhere down the road there might be input into another vision.
There's a British politician who laid out for their government the twelve steps to doing nothing. You know, you begin discussions with stakeholders; then you send out someone for a report; then you get the initial report back; you have more meetings with stakeholders; then you do a draft report, followed by a revised report; you might even get it to committee; then, by the time you're committed to doing anything, you're into an election, so you're running on a promise; and then you go back to square one.
I'm wondering if we're now in step two of the twelve-step process when we've already gone through the twelve steps. From your perspective, do we know what we need in terms of a museums policy in Canada? Have we previously done the work? Can we simply look at the recommendations that have come forward and have the government say either yea or nay, as opposed to putting us through another indeterminate period like the one we've just been through?