When I was at the event where Mr. Baird announced the cuts, he was very clear. He said that they had chosen a path to go after the programs that were wasteful, inefficient, and out of touch with average Canadians. You had said that you had criteria and that you had to make clear choices.
I'd like to follow up on the question my colleague, Mr. Fast, asked. If $3 million a year was not being spent in that program--if that's what I'm looking at in a snapshot year after year, that all the money was not going out--was it that the museums were wasteful and inefficient and weren't eligible, or was it that Canadian Heritage was not supplying the money that was needed out in the field?