I think providing that line was part of what went into it.
The Canadian Broadcast Standards Council had not once or twice, but to my knowledge at least three times, seizure of complaints and answered the complaints. The broadcaster didn't respond appropriately to those complaints. It escalated to the commission. We gave short-term renewals, and finally the line was crossed. The decision said what it said, and we made that decision.
I guess for broadcasters, the important thing is to read our decision, because we spelled out all the events that had occurred, including the CBSC hearings, very carefully. I would strongly suggest they read the unanimous Federal Court of Appeal decision that upheld the decision. I think it gives broadcasters a really good guideline of what is acceptable over the very powerful airwaves of this country as comment and what is regarded as abusive comment.