It's strictly for the collection, yes.
And the artists came up with criteria so that 60% is for emerging or new artists and 40% is for mid-career and prominent artists—and we still keep that division. We make sure there's regional representation and representation by gender as well, and sometimes we have regional juries. If we find, for example, that the north seems to be badly represented—the Yukon, the NWT, and Quebec and the Maritimes—we will have special juries every now and then just to get more from that region.
I didn't have time to show you this as well, but on the Indian/Inuit art site for Indian and Northern Affairs, we have the results of the last acquisition, which was fiscal year 2005-06. And you'll see photographs as well.
Someone was asking how we could better promote or show the art to Canadians. It's not easy; you need money. For example, just to show work on our Internet site from the artists we have—there are 34 works—we had to pay each artist for the right to show their work for one year. If we want to show other art, we have to pay the artists as well.
So to try to show a collection of 4,000 pieces would be phenomenal; we couldn't afford it.