Obviously not, Mr. Malo. I think you have summarized the situation very well. There are actually two factors that come into play here.
We need this policy very quickly, because our sector is regressing. The lack of a policy has some genuine negative consequences. In addition, there are the cutbacks. I'd just like to refer to them once again. I think it would be logical to review this cutback, and that it be cancelled and that we be given a guarantee that this will be done. I think this is required in order to restore the trust required for us to move towards developing a clear policy with the government.
How can we hope to have a clear, generous and forward-looking policy that really does the job if, at the same time, we are already slashing the only program for museums? Obviously, there is a huge paradox here. We are waiting for two signals. The Société des musées québécois has made two requests of this type, as we say in our brief. We ask that the trust be restored, and in order to do that, the government must have the courage to review this decision—something that would be much appreciated, and then deliver this policy we need so badly.