I have a quick follow-up question.
One of the main complaints is that the program has been too restrictive. For those who would seek to have true clarification of rights, it may involve a restriction or an expansion of rights, but those who would seek a restrictive application of charter rights and language rights have been excluded.
In fact, Mr. Bélanger knows very well that in certain circumstances those who have tried to use the CCP to, for example, protect English language rights have been excluded. He had personal involvement in one case, the Quigley case, which really drove home that point.
For both organizations, do you believe there should be some balance in how the CCP delivers its funding to the various groups that want clarification of the charter?