Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Just to follow up on something Mr. Angus articulated, he made the statement that the difference between him and perhaps members of the Conservative Party was that the Conservative Party did not believe in providing access to the disadvantaged if that access excluded the majority. I believe that was the gist of what he said. I don't believe that's the argument I've heard today, and I don't think it's the argument I've heard elsewhere regarding the court challenges program. As I understand it, the concern is that if we're going to provide access to the courts to the disadvantaged, it should be with equality of access to all the disadvantaged.
My colleague just asked the question to Mr. Carpay, is there something that can be done to improve that? Let me ask each one of you a twofold question. Is it your position that there should be exclusion of access to the courts by the disadvantaged in our community? If not, are you supportive of developing other means, whether through a CCP program or some other means, of ensuring that the voices of the disadvantaged are heard and that the disadvantaged have equal access to the court system?