I understand.
The comment I was sketching a moment ago is really appropriate then in that case. I see that the commitment to foster and protect the rights of those who least have them, which is what we really need to most concern ourselves with, is in the interests of the majority. That is my comment on that. It will always be in the interest of the majority.
I'm clearly not coming from the same place when I say that, because the majority, to the extent that is the broader Canadian society that we are all members of, will be living in a place where they can be assured that if their son, daughter, or they themselves become disabled, they will not then lose the entitlements and access to justice that they enjoyed when they weren't.