I find it really difficult to speculate. It took me by surprise, I must say, because I thought this program was widely recognized by existing and previous governments as a program that was something about which all of us would be proud.
I say that in consideration of the principles or the approach I have referred to in the comments I just provided. That is—and I think many of us have to come to terms with this at some point in our lives, professionally or personally—that those we believe should be entitled to protection from discrimination because they are historically disadvantaged are those whom we ourselves would be inclined to have discriminatory views against or have issues with, in some capacity.
I think there's something, in other words, about constitutional equality guarantees that this program is designed to protect that rises above what all of our individual impulses happen to be. I assumed there was a wide recognition of that.
I can't really speculate on those reasons.