I can speak for LEAF. We don't even know the political affiliation of our lawyers. It is completely immaterial.
The way we choose our lawyers, the way we choose our cases, is very much in line with the contribution agreement for the court challenges program itself, which is that the position we take must advance women's equality. That's not an ideological concept; that is, we start out, and our whole process involves consultations with the groups who are affected—academic consultations, subcommittees with academics, people who have the lived experience, and litigators.
It's out of that process that we decide what is in the economic interests of women, what is in their physical security interests. We don't start with a preconceived notion of what equality is or what position we should take. We look at the facts and ask what best helps women get economic security and physical security.
And when we choose our lawyers, the funding that the court challenges program provides is modest.