I'm not so far removed from opposition that I can't recall the desire to get at whatever the truth may be. Certainly, with our having just taken over, we have no vested interest in this whatsoever. With that qualification, I would like to see this motion go forward at an appropriate time.
If you take a look at the Quebec minister's report made public on May 5, and the Canadian heritage minister's report made public on May 6, and you read those, you will then have the total amount of testimony that will be permissible before this committee at this time.
Now, we can invite the witnesses to come and to read those reports. That's fine. But the fact is, with two sets of litigation that are currently in process, that are pending, while there is a possibility there might be a few extra small bits and pieces that the executives from Telefilm might be able to say, because of the fact that the matter is before the courts—not just in one instance, but in two—I can guarantee that the answers will be under very strict control of the lawyer who would be sitting beside them. They would make sure there wasn't any way that they were compromising the process.
What I'm trying to say is that I concur, I agree that this would be a very good motion, and at its time it should go forward. But to do so right now, I would suspect, could very well be a waste of time because of the constraints that would be on the witnesses at this time.