I appreciate what Mr. Fast said about his support for the charter, but I think this goes beyond or above Mr. Fast, given the fact that the Prime Minister clearly articulated that he doesn't believe in the process that is represented by the court challenges program when he said, “Trust me, I don't intend to introduce laws that violate the Constitution.”
As a lawyer, Mr. Fast must understand that it isn't for the government to determine whether or not the Constitution is violated by its laws. That's for the court to decide. That's the whole purpose of a charter.
So notwithstanding his support for the charter, I think this is a bigger problem than Mr. Fast.