I concur with Mr. Warkentin. I simply want to point out that the witness in question was the Société des musées québécois, which has been raising this problem for years. I really like report number 3, but regarding the list of exclusions, the all risk insurance, I would really like to know what that means. I presume that means that everything is covered. The list of exclusions in report number 1 is more appropriate because it is not always possible to ensure or ship works of art, under dangerous conditions, or to cover the transport in extreme weather and other conditions; it would be too expensive. That is the argument I want to make. I like report number 3 very much, except that I would use the list of exclusions from report number 1 rather than the one from report number 3.
On February 6th, 2007. See this statement in context.