We think the BDUs have an important role to play at the table, both at an operational level at our table, as they have in the past, and as major funders alongside the funding of the department. I guess what we think is logical is for the minister to be maintaining lines of communication. You see, we get all our policy direction from her. She has made an announcement about new funding. We expect there to be a fresh contribution agreement, with new provisions. There is no particular reason why she wouldn't discuss with them what the overriding policy objectives for the fund would be prior to signing the contribution agreement with us.
That is at a policy level, not at a commercial level. Because the Government of Canada is the largest single contributor, it obviously has the biggest voice, and it knows what it is trying to accomplish. So that dialogue and debate is useful, not only so the minister can hear what the other funders wish to contribute, but for us. It is a useful dialogue. But ultimately, we operate under contractual orders from the minister.