When the fund began there was no satellite distribution, so no contributions were made to the fund by satellite distributors and the only representation on the board came from cable operators. With the dawn of the satellite era and the commencement of contributions from the satellite side, we introduced one seat.
The satellite side has grown dramatically and now represents, I'm not sure if I have this exactly correct, roughly 40% of the overall contributions we receive. So our sense is that there's a proportionality issue, and we think the satellite guys should be at the table.
I'd also say that the current seat that is available to the satellite distributors has never been filled, and that has to do with the fact that the two satellite operators have not agreed with one another as to who should sit on our board. The addition of a second seat gives some relief to that, so it's a beneficial result to a logical step.