I'd like to comment on that just quickly, because I totally take your point and agree that particularly the announcement of the renewal and the time that it was made were an incredibly important signal to the industry. It was symbolic. We've been looking for this for some time, and we were very pleased to see it come at that time, because it was a very important reaffirmation of the fund. We wrote to the minister thanking her for the leadership she showed on that.
I think the reason this is perhaps difficult for her is simply that the immediate recourse here is really through regulation, through the regulator, and she's trying to get a handle simply on the implications of that. It's a very complicated issue, there's no question, but at the same time it looks to us like an assault on the regulation. Your original point was that these regulations are important, and probably it's important for the fund to be reaffirmed.
It is a public partnership. Mr. Kotto's comment about there being a war between the public and the private sector is very worrisome, I think. It's a public-private partnership, and it's important for the partners to get together again.