I have three quick points.
On the part II question, I think the distinction is that the contribution to the CTF is a condition of licence rather than a fee paid to a government agency. I see that as a difference.
On the minister being engaged in dialogue, I absolutely agree. It's a critical step in this process. If the largest players in our industry are going to listen to anybody, it's the Minister of Heritage.
To some extent, reiterating Maureen's comments, there is a role for the CRTC in this as well. In fact, in terms of the broader questions, the CRTC doesn't have a lot of teeth in this process. They're looking to enforce a circular, and they have no remedy other than potentially pulling a licence, which they've never done. So there needs to be consideration given to how to give them power to deal with these kinds of circumstances when they arise.