We are very much aware of the part II fees in the ruling. We think we do have regulation and that it is enforceable. Absolutely, as you said, the only way to know for sure is to let the CRTC do its job. Let's start the machine.
But if it is determined that those fees are not required and they are a form of taxation, I would call for an immediate review of their licence. For some reason unknown to me--and we haven't done all the digging--Shaw's licence has been extended for two years under an administrative review. I don't know why. They should have had a hearing in 2006.
Their licence is up for renewal in 2008. If it is determined that they are not going to contribute to the Canadian broadcasting system as required by the Broadcasting Act, their licence should be reviewed immediately. There has to be balance in the system. There has to be some integrity. It can't work all one way.