We've received testimony here, and I think you repeated it this morning, that you were part of the original proposal that came as a result of the licensing renewal. The amounts of fees that you were seeking after having done some capital improvements were no longer justified on that basis, so rather than seeing the fees lowered, you'd keep the fees and divide the money between the company and the fund at about 50-50. Is that correct? Is that what happened?
On February 20th, 2007. See this statement in context.