I think your comparison, or inferred comparison, is after we've had public hearings; this exercise has been very public, so it's a different thing. What the CRTC is proposing is that the hearings wouldn't be public. Ours were.
The fact that we're writing this in camera should not suggest anything other than it's the process because it's a draft report. The reality is that a draft report is massaged by the committee so that it becomes, at least at the optimum, a unanimous report.
You can't do that when you start here, but that does not forgive others who would wish to have the public part of this exercise private.
You were mentioning that comparison, and I didn't want that...I just wanted to draw your attention to that.