I just want to reflect and to reiterate what Andy and Angus are saying. I understand what it is that Mr. Kotto is trying to say. I think we all get the sense that somewhere along the way there has to be an ability for Parliament to intervene.
By the way, Parliament can intervene with the CRTC. The minister cannot, but Parliament can, because it exists at the will of Parliament. The statutes that govern the CRTC come from Parliament. So if we believe that sometime we need to make some sort of directional change because we are concerned about a direction, then I think Parliament has to have, through this committee, the ability to do that.
Also, I agree with the intent. I know exactly what he wants to do. But with his permission, perhaps we could withdraw this and all work on it with language that would be supported by all of us.
I would like to make the suggestion that we do that.