I disagree with your initial argument that there has been a breach of the law. As I explained to Mr. Scott, there has been no breach of the law here. What there has been is there have been no monthly payments. The monthly payments are traditional, but they're not mandated by law. So that section doesn't apply.
What we have here is a concern by people that the fund does not relate to its stated objective, namely to foster Canadian content, and it's not operated in an efficient way. Whether those allegations, assertions, whatever you want to call them, are correct or not is why we are making the inquiry or task force. It's really an evidence gathering. We will make our results public. I explained to you why we do it in confidence--so that we get to the root of issues.