As you know, we mandate payments into the CTF. As I mentioned before, since the payments weren't done on a monthly basis, we felt we had to step in because the convention was being broken, and this caused disarray in the industry. But over and above that, the criticisms levied at the fund are very clear and very serious.
We mandate too because we hope that the fund will produce Canadian content and add value to Canadian broadcasting, which is directly our responsibility. If the fund didn't do that any more or if the fund wasn't functioning properly because of internal dissent or lack of rules, or conflicts of interests, or whatever—there is a whole host of allegations—it would concern us very much, because it would have a definite impact on the quality of Canadian content produced, which leads to increased Canadian viewership and exposure on TV.
So that's why we step in and why we're doing it. We want to make sure this vehicle, which has worked in the past, will work in the future. Or, if it needs reform, it will be reformed so that it achieves its purpose and won't be driven by dissent, making it therefore ineffective in achieving the full purpose for which it was set up.