As a clarification, the recommendations coming forth now are not an afterthought or an attempt to take over Mr. von Finckenstein's work. For the record, we were the first point of contact on this issue. It was the heritage committee that stepped in, called for witnesses, said that we would study this, and issued a report. This is something that we must complete.
Part of issuing a report is coming forward with recommendations, regardless of whether Mr. von Finckenstein has his own process in place. I don't believe you can usurp the work that we began here, because people are looking to us to come forward with clear recommendations.
What I suggest is that we seem to have a general sense of the narrative, and the question is on the recommendations. Should we vote to go forward and look at the recommendations, yes or no? If we vote to go forward with the recommendations, we can start to go through them point by point and find out whether or not there's agreement or changes. Perhaps that's a better way to spend the other hour and a half of our time this morning.