My comment may not seem particularly relevant to some. However, as I read it, I really had the feeling I was reading a report from the Minister, rather than a Committee report. Indeed, despite some criticism here and there, there is no mention of the inertia and hesitation that has characterized her approach to this issue. At the same time, mention is made of actions she took that led to a situational and fragile resolution to this problem. That is the only criticism I would make in that regard.
I have looked at Mr. Angus's proposal. I believe my position is closer to what is expressed in this proposal. Indeed, if we are going to talk about what the Minister did in relation to this issue, I think it is only fair to talk about what the Opposition did. Without pressure from the Opposition in the House and Mr. Angus's motion, I very much doubt that a positive outcome would have emerged so quickly.
Thank you.