Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you for coming back, Mr. von Finckenstein. We're feeling like old friends here; we keep meeting like this.
I'd like to follow up on our discussion of the other day on the whole role of moving forward on closed-door meetings. We've already discussed the CTF, so I'm not going to go there, but I'm interested in the role of the CRTC and how it accomplishes its stated goal, which I found under “Accomplishments 2005-2006” on its website. It said the commission processes are “fair, transparent, and effective.” Yet since 2003 the CRTC has made at least 90 decisions involving transfers of ownership that have had no public process whatsoever, no publication, no gazetting, no intervention process.
In order for justice to be seen to be done, I'd like to get your perspective on how we ensure transparency and openness when there's a major amount of change being made apparently behind closed doors.