Yes, okay.
Canadian ownership is clearly a very important key to Canadian culture, communications, etc. I was before this committee at one point in time as Commissioner of Competition and I talked about Canadian ownership. At that point in time, I talked about the transportation of signal, and I suggested if we wanted to loosen the Canadian ownership rules you could do it where you talk purely transportation of signal. Whether the signal is a broadcasting signal or a telecom signal, to the carrier it makes no difference, he just wants to carry as many signals as possible.
Therefore, in terms of ownership, I think the considerations are quite different when you talk about telecom from when you talk about broadcasting. It is our mandate at the CRTC, which is clearly on the broadcasting side, to ensure Canadian content. I don't see how you can foster Canadian content and have it part of your DNA if you're not Canadian. I just don't see that. I think the broadcasting industry and the Canadian ownership is absolute. But if you did separate totally telecom from broadcasting and just talked about carriage of signal, I don't see why you couldn't loosen the rules and ensure a greater access to foreign capital.
That's not part of my mandate, I understand, but the researchers have done some research. I made those statements previously, and I have not departed from those. They are very much restricted to the carriage of signal.