It's a very short comment.
This motion comes from February 26, 2007, when we were discussing the Canadian Television Fund. There was ample opportunity at that time to deal with the various recommendations. This motion did not come forward then. It's coming forward after a report has been submitted to Parliament. If we accept this, it will certainly bring into question the credibility of our heritage committee, since we would now be running across with addenda to reports that have already been brought before Parliament.
Secondly, I think it brings into question the credibility of this committee if we even raise issues about political interference at the CRTC. If some of us have objections to the minister directing things we don't like, how can we turn around and tell the CRTC to do their job after we have already submitted our report? This is too little, too late, and it should not be accepted.