Notwithstanding the words of my friend, the fact of the matter is that this motion is questioning what the motivation of the CRTC might be. It also questions their level of competence. It's absolutely outrageous.
Totally apart from that, I would like the clerk to tell us if the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage has the authority to make a statement that we “require”. If it's the desire of the members to suggest, then of course the government would vote against that, but that's up to the committee. The difference here is that I'm asking about the word “require”. We don't have the capacity to require the CRTC to do anything, do we?