First, thank you for the question. It is so broad that if you don't mind, I'll give a very short answer and then ask Jennifer, who is responsible for radio, and Richard, because you've hit on a few points that are extremely important.
Firstly, I don't see new technology as an obstacle. I see it as an opportunity. I think if you look at the number of downloads we're getting and the age of the people who are downloading.... When we do a million downloads a month, they're of programs like Ideas. These are programs I can't convince my son to listen to at nine o'clock at night, but if he wants to listen to them while he's on a treadmill, that's just fine.
The technology is changing the whole game, and that's why I said as well that we are more and more a program creator than we are a broadcasting network for radio or a broadcasting network for TV, and that's part of the change that is going to have to occur as we move forward. We must supply the content to Canadians when they want to listen to or watch it.
I think some of our new programs, such as The Current, are doing exactly what you described, and they're attracting a large audience, an important audience.
Let me add just one more thing. The worst thing that could happen to this country would be if we were the sole supplier of information and news. We don't want a monopoly. I would be devastated as a citizen. People should be able to get their news and information from NPR, from CBC, from RDI, and from CNN. So a monopoly would be the worst thing. But what there must be is a Canadian alternative, with a Canadian interpretation. That's the balance I look for.
When you tell me they're listening to satellite radio, well, that's fine, as long as they also come and listen to us.